Definition: If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken;
Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this incredibly important verse from John 10:35. It's a really fascinating and potent statement about Jesus and His power. Here’s a simple explanation: The Core Idea: Jesus says, “If anyone calls me God, then the word of God will not die.” Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “John 10:35” : This is the verse itself – a specific part of a larger passage in John's Gospel. “If he called them gods…” : Jesus isn’t saying that he is God. He’s using this phrase to highlight something incredibly significant about His relationship with God. It means that if someone were to claim Jesus is God, it would mean that the Bible – and everything written about God – would be broken . “unto whom the word of God came…” : This refers to God as revealed through Scripture (the Bible). Think of it like a blueprint or a guide. God speaks through His Word, which is filled with truth and wisdom. “and the scripture cannot be broken” : This is the key part. The Bible – including its Old Testament stories, teachings, and promises – is considered indestructible and unchanging. It’s a divine message that has always been true. So, what does it mean ? Jesus is saying that His authority and truth are absolute. He isn't just speaking about human interpretations of the Bible; he’s asserting that His words are God’s word, and therefore, they cannot be altered or broken. It’s a statement of complete and unwavering divine power. Why is this important? This verse is often interpreted as: Jesus' Divine Authority: It emphasizes Jesus’ unique position as the Son of God – the one who reveals God’s will. The Bible’s Eternity: It suggests that the Bible has always been true and will continue to be true forever, even after death. In short, it’s a powerful statement about the enduring truth and authority of Scripture. --- Do you want me to: Explain another part of John 10? Discuss the meaning in a different way (e.g., from a theological perspective)?